<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tourism Can Do More, Much More!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: delina</title>
		<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15473</link>
		<dc:creator>delina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dominica-weekly.com/?p=6284#comment-15473</guid>
		<description>how ar u chris and pete :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how ar u chris and pete <img src='http://www.dominica-weekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15430</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dominica-weekly.com/?p=6284#comment-15430</guid>
		<description>From pete&#039;s 1st comment I quote - &quot; I have always said you don’t put your house in shape because of a visitor, but do it because its the proper thing to do...&quot; 
Right on Pete!  Words to live by in a broader sense as well. Do right for yourself and others  becuase it is the proper thing to do,  don&#039;t wait to do it to be showy.
I also agree with the commenters here that night lighting at the airport would make Dominica more accessible. The airport has greatly upgraded in the last year and it was nice to see. 
God Bless Dominica!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From pete&#8217;s 1st comment I quote &#8211; &#8221; I have always said you don’t put your house in shape because of a visitor, but do it because its the proper thing to do&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Right on Pete!  Words to live by in a broader sense as well. Do right for yourself and others  becuase it is the proper thing to do,  don&#8217;t wait to do it to be showy.<br />
I also agree with the commenters here that night lighting at the airport would make Dominica more accessible. The airport has greatly upgraded in the last year and it was nice to see.<br />
God Bless Dominica!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15427</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dominica-weekly.com/?p=6284#comment-15427</guid>
		<description>Good point. That airport! Every administration conducts feasibility studies. Invariably, someone of major influence says its too  expensive and shoots it down. (Freedom party claimed the UWP prevented the US gov&#039;t from helping start one). One administration actually bought the land for the airport and claimed that the money was already secured to start work.  Indeed a school was moved to a new location partly in preparation for this. The current administration (put a hold to review major projects including the airport planned) and then claimed that the European Union would only give funds for rehab of the existing so it accepted that instead. Not sure why no one thought or acted on a BOOT (Build own operate and transfer) arrangement, whereby it could be funded from private sources, at little or no cost to the taxpayer and later transferred to the country This has been done the world over, even in the Caribbean. See the attached document.

http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PublicPolicyJournal/202silva.pdf

Of course even with a  BOOT it has to be shown to investors that it would be profitable. But indeed, Dominica will be the last to have its international airport in the region.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. That airport! Every administration conducts feasibility studies. Invariably, someone of major influence says its too  expensive and shoots it down. (Freedom party claimed the UWP prevented the US gov&#8217;t from helping start one). One administration actually bought the land for the airport and claimed that the money was already secured to start work.  Indeed a school was moved to a new location partly in preparation for this. The current administration (put a hold to review major projects including the airport planned) and then claimed that the European Union would only give funds for rehab of the existing so it accepted that instead. Not sure why no one thought or acted on a BOOT (Build own operate and transfer) arrangement, whereby it could be funded from private sources, at little or no cost to the taxpayer and later transferred to the country This has been done the world over, even in the Caribbean. See the attached document.</p>
<p><a href="http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PublicPolicyJournal/202silva.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PublicPolicyJournal/202silva.pdf</a></p>
<p>Of course even with a  BOOT it has to be shown to investors that it would be profitable. But indeed, Dominica will be the last to have its international airport in the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Halfwassen</title>
		<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15426</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Halfwassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dominica-weekly.com/?p=6284#comment-15426</guid>
		<description>Airport, airport, airport. This project is #1 priority in improving the tourism experience. Allow for early morning and night landings would go WAY far in getting people to the island. Do you know how tough it is to get to and from Dominica in one travel day? You have to REALLY want to be there in order to use your dollars to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airport, airport, airport. This project is #1 priority in improving the tourism experience. Allow for early morning and night landings would go WAY far in getting people to the island. Do you know how tough it is to get to and from Dominica in one travel day? You have to REALLY want to be there in order to use your dollars to get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.dominica-weekly.com/tourism-can-do-more-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15424</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dominica-weekly.com/?p=6284#comment-15424</guid>
		<description>Good point to focus on Chris. However my contention is that yes, more support should be given to the tourism industry by means of incentives and infrastructure and ways of facilitating business. But tourism really is everyone&#039;s business now. Or at least it should. And if we focus instead on overall country development, not just physically, but socially, environmentally, including human resource development, and other agents of economic development, this will filter into the tourist industry. For example, a highly educated population will make it easier to give better customer service to the tourist. If we aspire to have sound environmental and planning policies and encourage things like proper waste disposal, construction of buildings and roads for sustainable progress, then the visitors will benefit and also have  a more rewarding experience. If you have more people gainfully employed you could have less crime or less harrasment of tourists, resulting in a better experience by visitors. I have always said you don&#039;t put your house in shape because of a  visitor, but do it because its the proper thing to do and if the visitor appreciates this, then kudos to you (and the word gets around)! 

So yes, let&#039;s focus on plowing investment in the industry where possible, but if we need to emphasize people development first in all considerations, then some things will filter down to that industry as well.  We also realize that financial resources are scarce and  that the government is not sitting on a pile of money at all. But yes, lets seek to prioritize and support this vital industry where possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point to focus on Chris. However my contention is that yes, more support should be given to the tourism industry by means of incentives and infrastructure and ways of facilitating business. But tourism really is everyone&#8217;s business now. Or at least it should. And if we focus instead on overall country development, not just physically, but socially, environmentally, including human resource development, and other agents of economic development, this will filter into the tourist industry. For example, a highly educated population will make it easier to give better customer service to the tourist. If we aspire to have sound environmental and planning policies and encourage things like proper waste disposal, construction of buildings and roads for sustainable progress, then the visitors will benefit and also have  a more rewarding experience. If you have more people gainfully employed you could have less crime or less harrasment of tourists, resulting in a better experience by visitors. I have always said you don&#8217;t put your house in shape because of a  visitor, but do it because its the proper thing to do and if the visitor appreciates this, then kudos to you (and the word gets around)! </p>
<p>So yes, let&#8217;s focus on plowing investment in the industry where possible, but if we need to emphasize people development first in all considerations, then some things will filter down to that industry as well.  We also realize that financial resources are scarce and  that the government is not sitting on a pile of money at all. But yes, lets seek to prioritize and support this vital industry where possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

